|
Post by millring on Nov 9, 2018 10:36:41 GMT -5
But you do have a habit of writing cryptic asides assuming people will understand. You mean like, "That's quite telling"?
|
|
|
Post by epaul on Nov 9, 2018 10:39:03 GMT -5
Ah, but what's time to a pig?
|
|
|
Post by dradtke on Nov 9, 2018 12:45:50 GMT -5
But you do have a habit of writing cryptic asides assuming people will understand. You mean like, "That's quite telling"? That was one of them.
|
|
|
Post by millring on Nov 9, 2018 12:47:25 GMT -5
One is the loneliest number that you'll ever do.
|
|
|
Post by james on Nov 9, 2018 21:28:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by james on Nov 9, 2018 22:36:56 GMT -5
If the Obama White House had suspended the credentials of a reporter because Obama got his back up about a particular line of questioning (and Obama has famously complained about his treatment by press - make fun of that fact if you feel you need to, but just look at the record) some members of this forum would have gone batshit. It's been a while, so I'm not sure how many "went batshit", but the Obama White House tried to ban an entire network (Fox News). Several other networks threatened a boycott which led to Fox being allowed a seat at the event. Even if you paint it blue or red, bullshit still smells just as bad. www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/23/white-houses-fox-news-boy_n_331437.htmlI was trying to remember the Fox news exclusion affair. There's an account of sorts on Wikipedia. What went down doesn't seem entirely cut and dried. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_controversies#Obama_administration_conflict_with_Fox_News
|
|