|
|
Post by Chesapeake on Apr 10, 2020 16:56:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Village Idiot on Apr 10, 2020 17:39:01 GMT -5
This is good to know. Kim and I are planning on walking the mostly abandoned nature trail near our house, but we will be passing people maybe once in a while. Thanks for the post.
|
|
|
|
Post by jdd2 on Apr 10, 2020 19:06:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by John B on Apr 11, 2020 9:16:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by millring on Apr 11, 2020 9:34:45 GMT -5
Dar and I were talking about the "study" this article is referring to (the one Don shared) on our run this morning and concluded the entire thing was utterly BS. You'd have to not be a runner to believe any of it. |
|
|
|
Post by billhammond on Apr 11, 2020 10:10:21 GMT -5
Dar and I were talking about this "study" on our run this morning and concluded the entire thing was utterly BS. You'd have to not be a runner to believe any of it. Talking while running just heightens other runners' risk, you know.  |
|
|
|
Post by Chesapeake on Apr 11, 2020 12:40:54 GMT -5
Dar and I were talking about the "study" this article is referring to (the one Don shared) on our run this morning and concluded the entire thing was utterly BS. You'd have to not be a runner to believe any of it. I run, and I don't see what that has to do with it. Anyway, the study does have the advantage of computer simulations based on actual research. If the choice is between hard data and thought experiments, I'd be inclined to favor the data. Not to stir this pot or anything, but, there is this. (From a Fox news affiliate, I see.) Exercising outdoors |
|
