|
|
Post by sidheguitarmichael on Oct 31, 2020 13:13:37 GMT -5
If you like a culture filled with mandatory loyalty oaths, mandatory re-education training, and open racial discrimination, then by all means, continue to ignore this. For your pleasure. Original: www.thefire.org/investigation-portlands-lewis-clark-college-mandates-racial-segregation-in-orientation-programming/I’ll leave you with this: I have a friend who is a professor, in another discipline, at a university in the PacNW that will remain nameless, for reasons that will become apparent. It’s in Oregon, though. He was told, by his supervisors in the org hierarchy, to report for a mandatory 3-hour diversity training. Among the other topics du jour that you would be familiar with, he received instruction that professors are to refer to time—including class time—as “colonial minutes,” because only white people are on time—that’s a quote.. As well, they were informed that excellence and math are racist concepts. He and I are keeping screenshots of some of the better gems we come across as we do our jobs, for posterity. Lastly, I see that the NAMM foundation is sponsoring your guy, Ibram Kendi. You’re welcome. Have a great weekend.  |
|
|
|
Post by james on Oct 31, 2020 13:58:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Oct 31, 2020 17:16:10 GMT -5
I do wonder if ACB hurts Trump's chances in an unexpected way. Never mind the unhinged wailing from the left. They were never going to vote for him anyway. What I wonder about is my good friend Lane from Utah. Lane is an observant Mormon, and he swallowed hard to vote Trump in 2016. Trump's vulgarity was hard to get past. What settled it for Lane was the certain prospect of SCOTUS nominations. He trusted Trump to nominate Originalists. That was it. (The manifest vulgarities in the House of Clinton made it easier to swallow.) With a low probability of SCOTUS vacancies in the next term, that rationale is off the table for the most part. I wonder how many "hesitant but SCOTUS" voters Trump loses. Today, Lane etal can look at their 2016 vote, observe that they got the SCOTUS they wanted, and declare "mission accomplished". There are now 6 Catholics on the SCOTUS. Papists rule ! |
|
|
|
Post by jdd2 on Oct 31, 2020 17:19:44 GMT -5
It all started with JFK.
|
|
|
|
Post by aquaduct on Oct 31, 2020 18:35:19 GMT -5
I do wonder if ACB hurts Trump's chances in an unexpected way. Never mind the unhinged wailing from the left. They were never going to vote for him anyway. What I wonder about is my good friend Lane from Utah. Lane is an observant Mormon, and he swallowed hard to vote Trump in 2016. Trump's vulgarity was hard to get past. What settled it for Lane was the certain prospect of SCOTUS nominations. He trusted Trump to nominate Originalists. That was it. (The manifest vulgarities in the House of Clinton made it easier to swallow.) With a low probability of SCOTUS vacancies in the next term, that rationale is off the table for the most part. I wonder how many "hesitant but SCOTUS" voters Trump loses. Today, Lane etal can look at their 2016 vote, observe that they got the SCOTUS they wanted, and declare "mission accomplished". There are now 6 Catholics on the SCOTUS. Papists rule ! Yes, we do. |
|
