|
Post by Rob Hanesworth on Aug 8, 2023 14:20:11 GMT -5
Does anyone know how the Senate's rules came about, why they are as they are, and what it takes to change them?
My question is prompted by the "hold" Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville has placed on over 300 military promotions, leaving the Army and Marine Corps without confirmed leaders and the position of Joint Chief also coming vacant in September.
Tuberville takes issue with Pentagon policy regarding payment for travel to get abortions. He has not introduced legislation to change the policy.
I don't want to start a debate on abortion policy. We've thoroughly aired our views on that.
Rather, I would like to be educated on how it came to be that a single Senator has the power to hold up legislation and confirmation. Apparently he could do it over any issue--changing uniform colors to pink, mandating kilts, etc.
Acting leaders of a military branch, per reports, don't have full budgeting and planning authority. Also, nominees for promotion and their families are in limbo regarding moving to new offices and bases.
Normally the confirmations are grouped and approved by voice vote. There is a way around the block but would require acting on each promotion separately with several procedural votes to move each promotion along.
Any insights?
|
|
Dub
Administrator
I'm gettin' so the past is the only thing I can remember.
Posts: 19,958
|
Post by Dub on Aug 8, 2023 14:33:39 GMT -5
|
|