Post by t-bob on Apr 24, 2024 13:46:30 GMT -5
a collaboration -a review
This Netflix original surprisingly came to my attention. It was only very recent was I aware of this film’s existence or such a high caliber actor, like Anthony Hopkins, was in the leading role. Freud’s Last Session centers on a discussion/argument between two notable figures in history. Sigmund Freud (played by Hopkins) and CS Lewis (played by actor Matthew Goode, notable roles such as The Crown and Watchmen). The topic of this creative discussion is whether or not God exists. Interesting concept no doubt, between the description and trailer I was intrigued to give this film a day.
It can be difficult at times to separate between expectations from one trailer to what is presented. I envisioned two strong actors going head-to-head for two hours arguing the existence of God. While a bottle movie may not interest every audience member; however, if done correctly, it could work depending on the subject matter. Make no mistake, the debate takes place in this film and the performances from each actor was well done. The set design was also well done, or at least convincing, considering the debate takes place in Freud’s office. I would’ve liked to have seen more of the debate between both characters with valid arguments on each side.
It can be distracting when the conversation gets interrupted with repeated flashbacks or putting additional focus on side characters. While the flashbacks attempt to build the backstory between each man, it takes away the flow of the conversation. Other events that happen in this film, such as the bombing of London, affect the characters in the story and add to the conversation. I appreciated this aspect in the film, and I would consider it appropriate. The The focus on the main side character, Freud’s daughter Anna, takes the viewer away from the debate. She is also seen in flashback scenes with Freud, which add to Freuds character; however, I wonder if it would be beneficial if Anna Freud had her own movie centered on her achievements. Nevertheless, this film presented too many flashbacks and cut-aways to side characters which made this film feel disorganized.
Overall, I like the premise of this film, and the overall look of the film sets you in the late 1930s. However, the consistent flashbacks, and shifting focus to side characters, interrupts the flow of the movie too much to ignore.
I enjoyed - the 4 0f 5 - 4 stars
This Netflix original surprisingly came to my attention. It was only very recent was I aware of this film’s existence or such a high caliber actor, like Anthony Hopkins, was in the leading role. Freud’s Last Session centers on a discussion/argument between two notable figures in history. Sigmund Freud (played by Hopkins) and CS Lewis (played by actor Matthew Goode, notable roles such as The Crown and Watchmen). The topic of this creative discussion is whether or not God exists. Interesting concept no doubt, between the description and trailer I was intrigued to give this film a day.
It can be difficult at times to separate between expectations from one trailer to what is presented. I envisioned two strong actors going head-to-head for two hours arguing the existence of God. While a bottle movie may not interest every audience member; however, if done correctly, it could work depending on the subject matter. Make no mistake, the debate takes place in this film and the performances from each actor was well done. The set design was also well done, or at least convincing, considering the debate takes place in Freud’s office. I would’ve liked to have seen more of the debate between both characters with valid arguments on each side.
It can be distracting when the conversation gets interrupted with repeated flashbacks or putting additional focus on side characters. While the flashbacks attempt to build the backstory between each man, it takes away the flow of the conversation. Other events that happen in this film, such as the bombing of London, affect the characters in the story and add to the conversation. I appreciated this aspect in the film, and I would consider it appropriate. The The focus on the main side character, Freud’s daughter Anna, takes the viewer away from the debate. She is also seen in flashback scenes with Freud, which add to Freuds character; however, I wonder if it would be beneficial if Anna Freud had her own movie centered on her achievements. Nevertheless, this film presented too many flashbacks and cut-aways to side characters which made this film feel disorganized.
Overall, I like the premise of this film, and the overall look of the film sets you in the late 1930s. However, the consistent flashbacks, and shifting focus to side characters, interrupts the flow of the movie too much to ignore.
I enjoyed - the 4 0f 5 - 4 stars
