|
Roe V Wade
Jun 30, 2022 11:47:01 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by millring on Jun 30, 2022 11:47:01 GMT -5
Maybe if you didn't overstate the proposition to score points with your vulgar ridicule a discussion might ensue. My posts were clearly and specifically a reaction to some of the judgements made here concerning the motivation and character of a couple high school kids, all based solely on Todd’s description of twenty-second radio interview. Below are your comments concerning the motivation and character of these kids based on this re-telling of a twenty-second radio interview. Ok, while you didn’t specifically use the word “rabbit sex”, I don’t believe I mischaracterized the singular motivation you applied to a couple upset and angry kids and the damning judgement you made of their character. Do you even listen to yourself? Yes, and I hinted not even a little that I meant " f-ing like rabbits"
|
|
|
Post by John B on Jun 30, 2022 12:16:51 GMT -5
So I worked this morning and am now taking a lunch break to catch up with friends.
Jan, thank you for your comments and your perspective. I really appreciate hearing what your have to say.
John, I'm not sure what your were saying your thought Paul thought was reasonable. I'm not trying to stir up anything by changing topics; in just trying to understand your point.
Was it that Paul would agree with his exaggerated wrote - and that agreement was unreasonable, or was it that Paul agreed with the idea of boycotting something because someone doesn't agree with (whatever), and boycotting is unreasonable?
I think it is completely reasonable to boycott. Whether I agree with the underlying reasoning if a different matter. I don't support boycotting Disney for perceived pro gay or anti gay bias, but I'm ok with other people doing so. I may think the boycotters reasoning is unreasonable, but that's another matter.
|
|
|
Post by millring on Jun 30, 2022 17:31:54 GMT -5
So I worked this morning and am now taking a lunch break to catch up with friends. Jan, thank you for your comments and your perspective. I really appreciate hearing what your have to say. John, I'm not sure what your were saying your thought Paul thought was reasonable. I'm not trying to stir up anything by changing topics; in just trying to understand your point. Was it that Paul would agree with his exaggerated wrote - and that agreement was unreasonable, or was it that Paul agreed with the idea of boycotting something because someone doesn't agree with (whatever), and boycotting is unreasonable? I think it is completely reasonable to boycott. Whether I agree with the underlying reasoning if a different matter. I don't support boycotting Disney for perceived pro gay or anti gay bias, but I'm ok with other people doing so. I may think the boycotters reasoning is unreasonable, but that's another matter. You're probably right and I'm probably wrong. You interpreted it as a threat to boycott. I heard someone scared to go where they wouldn't have access to an abortion.
|
|
|
Post by jdd2 on Jun 30, 2022 17:42:40 GMT -5
Roy V Wayne
|
|
|
Roe V Wade
Jun 30, 2022 17:55:58 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by John B on Jun 30, 2022 17:55:58 GMT -5
So I worked this morning and am now taking a lunch break to catch up with friends. Jan, thank you for your comments and your perspective. I really appreciate hearing what your have to say. John, I'm not sure what your were saying your thought Paul thought was reasonable. I'm not trying to stir up anything by changing topics; in just trying to understand your point. Was it that Paul would agree with his exaggerated wrote - and that agreement was unreasonable, or was it that Paul agreed with the idea of boycotting something because someone doesn't agree with (whatever), and boycotting is unreasonable? I think it is completely reasonable to boycott. Whether I agree with the underlying reasoning if a different matter. I don't support boycotting Disney for perceived pro gay or anti gay bias, but I'm ok with other people doing so. I may think the boycotters reasoning is unreasonable, but that's another matter. You're probably right and I'm probably wrong. You interpreted it as a threat to boycott. I heard someone scared to go where they wouldn't have access to an abortion. I suggest we are probably both right.
|
|