|
Post by Russell Letson on Oct 30, 2019 18:46:44 GMT -5
We now know that . . . the original copy of the suspect dossier didn't have the names and places in it, just blanks to fill in depending on which candidate you wanted to smear which wouldn't be known until after the primaries. That's a remarkable assertion, and I'd admire to hear where it comes from. Googling "steele dossier blanks" mostly returns citations of a John Solomon op-ed in which he cites a source saying that an FBI fact-checking spreadsheet was "a sea of blanks, meaning most claims couldn’t be corroborated." That's quite different from a bunch of accusations with blanks for the targets' names.
|
|
|
Post by Rob Hanesworth on Oct 30, 2019 19:00:39 GMT -5
This thread had almost died at page 23 and slipped off into oblivion. But it was given CPR and revived because, you know, there was still hope we could come to consensus on this issue.
Just a few more pages of repeating the same arguments and I am sure we will be there.
|
|
|
Post by Cornflake on Oct 30, 2019 19:02:51 GMT -5
Rob, please let me know when that universal epiphany occurs.
|
|
|
Post by Rob Hanesworth on Oct 30, 2019 19:05:38 GMT -5
Rob, please let me know when that universal epiphany occurs. Listen for the choral music from the clouds.
|
|
|
Post by brucemacneill on Oct 30, 2019 19:13:58 GMT -5
We now know that . . . the original copy of the suspect dossier didn't have the names and places in it, just blanks to fill in depending on which candidate you wanted to smear which wouldn't be known until after the primaries. That's a remarkable assertion, and I'd admire to hear where it comes from. Googling "steele dossier blanks" mostly returns citations of a John Solomon op-ed in which he cites a source saying that an FBI fact-checking spreadsheet was "a sea of blanks, meaning most claims couldn’t be corroborated." That's quite different from a bunch of accusations with blanks for the targets' names. I hope you'll find out soon but for now, wait for it.
|
|
|
Post by aquaduct on Oct 30, 2019 20:27:02 GMT -5
I hope that House and Senate Republicans start distancing themselves from Trump. Sooner is better. Doubtful that will happen. Trump's given the Republicans a roadmap to fighting against at least 60 years of progressive drift in government. And he's taking all the political heat. And this impeachment stuff is simply Clinton's "depends what the meaning of is is" taken to a truly absurd level. Democrats are panicked and for good reason. And Republicans would be idiots to turn thier backs on Trump.
|
|
|
Post by casualplayerpaul on Oct 30, 2019 21:33:52 GMT -5
I'm still waiting for the IG's report on the Obama and deep state shenanigans. Oh, and thanks for using shenanigans so I didn't have to look it up to spell it. Happy to use and spell this friendly sounding euphemism for the ratfucking that Team Trump is actually engaged in. As a charter member of Deep State, I am always pleased to help out. Cheers!
|
|
|
Post by millring on Oct 31, 2019 5:02:12 GMT -5
A musician friend on fb sez "As anyone who knows me can tell you, I'm not exactly a sports enthusiast. But I'm completely OVER THE MOON at the Nat's world series win. Why? Let's just say, for SO many reasons"
Everyone knows what the real game is.
|
|